Stock Bias Test Results

I ran a post on Friday titled, Stock Bias Test, which has become one of the more popular pages on my site in only a few days. My site doesn’t generate a large number of comments per blog post, maybe 2 to 4 per post on average, but this topic got more than 30 people to respond (a huge success in my “comments world”). I guess I do a poor job in sparking conversation based on what I write.

Anyway, everyone seemed to like the exercise of analyzing the charts without a ticker symbol or frame of time.

I asked a few questions:

  • Which stock would you buy below based on the nameless & dateless charts? (listed 1,2,3,4)
  • How would you rank them in order of technical characteristics?
  • Would you avoid buying of any of the stocks below based on price and volume?
  • Would you short any of the stocks below?

Overall, many of you struck out and did not get the analysis right but I do have to say a that a few of you did a wonderful job.

The best response in the comments that I could find clearly comes from Alex who runs a blog on his google pages.
He nailed every chart (I wonder if he figured them out) as a few of you did.

#1 is the strongest buy. The last candle on #1 sets the high of the chart, therefore it’s moving into uncharted terrritory with no overhead sellers. Also, the last dip down to the 40-period line was on low and decreasing volume, thus few sellers there. Then it spiked off the 40-period MA with strong volume. Then it continued the uptrend for 5 candles.
#3 would be my second strongest buy for similar reasons, but I’d like to see what the next few candles do.
#2 & #4 I would leave alone because of the heavy selling volume on the last dips. But I wouldn’t short them because they are still above the 40-day MA.

I had to hide Aurelien’s answers for chart #3 as he guessed it: AAPL.

Steven Mac may have summed up the approach to the analysis the best by saying:

While the exercise is based upon price & volume alone or techincal aspects, for the record I wouldn’t move into a position unless I can see at least:

1) Risk-to-Reward.
2) RS Strength
3) Industry Group/Sister Stock Information
4) Fundamentals on Ownership
5) Overall Market Direction Factor

Overall – it was a great exercise and a wonderful success. I plan to do more of these in the future (possibly bi-weekly if everyone stays interested).

The original snapshots of the charts I uploaded on Friday are highlighted in blue (on the charts below). As you can see, #1 (BIDU) and #3 (AAPL) were super successful and #2 (MS) and #4 (BSC) broke down.

Proper risk/ reward setups and sell rules would have saved you from losing large amounts of money in MS and BSC so don’t worry if you got them wrong. Worry if you got it wrong and then avoided selling a clear loser.

Comments

  1. Wow…phew!!! Glad that it was just an exercise, I was going to buy Morgan Stanley…

  2. Same! My margin account would have been so delinquent that they would have had to repossess all of my ramen. 🙁

    Thanks a lot for the eye-opener – I knew they’d be big-name stocks, but didn’t quite suspect the charts would be from that long ago. Do more of these, please!

  3. It’s a good exercise but there are probably plenty of charts like BIDU’s that failed spectacularly.

    It’s fair to leave out the name but the ‘sector’ would be good to know. Obviously if you know that ‘x’ is a financial stock it’s probably going to drop.

    I mean — here’s a chart that I think is similar to BIDU — new high was hit on strong volume. In the energy sector.

    http://stockcharts.com/h-sc/ui?s=ACFN&p=D&yr=0&mn=9&dy=0&id=p99520663576

    So far — no massive breakout. If only you could cherry pick your own charts…

  4. I didn’t put my 2 cents in because you had plenty of comments but I did the exercise in my head and yes, number one looked like the stongest to buy. Which I believe you said that was bidu, thanks for the exercise.

  5. a5,
    Sector would be good to know as noted in the highlighted comments above but that wasn’t the point of the exercise. You mention “financial” and immediately form a bias.

    I understand that stocks move in groups but look at the bias you already formed.

    ACFM looks nothing like BIDU at $6 per share and average volume of 40k shares per day. No institutional support with your stock.

    BIDU was doing millions per day at the start of the run and 20 million per week during the run – clear institutional support.

  6. I think i need to buy Brian’s book.
    Thanks Chris

  7. chris,

    thanks for u r post , i do look for it.

    question – are you increasing u r position in SOL as it is beaten down so much. I am looking at some long date calles.

    please let me know ur thoughts.

    thanks

  8. Aurelien says

    Excellent idea Chris! I’m annoyed that I did not figure out that #1 was BIDU as I had options on it when it made its move up from 90 to 130. Unfortunately, I books my profit then instead of holdign on.

Speak Your Mind

*